November 13th, 2024

November 13th, 2024

November 13th, 2024

NYC DCWP Delays Enforcement and Expands Scope of Amended Debt Collection Rules

In a recent update, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (NYC DCWP) announced that it will delay the enforcement of its amended debt collection regulations from December 1, 2024, to April 1, 2025.

In a recent update, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (NYC DCWP) announced that it will delay the enforcement of its amended debt collection regulations from December 1, 2024, to April 1, 2025.

In a recent update, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (NYC DCWP) announced that it will delay the enforcement of its amended debt collection regulations from December 1, 2024, to April 1, 2025.

This postponement, made in response to industry concerns and a legal challenge from ACA International, Inc. and Independent Recovery Resources, Inc., also aligns the effective date with the new enforcement timeline. The recent amendments, however, mark a significant shift in the scope of NYC’s debt collection rules, expanding regulatory obligations to include creditors collecting their own debts. To clarify these changes, NYC DCWP held a Q&A session on November 7, where it was confirmed that the amended rules would indeed apply to creditors—even though the updated definition of “debt collector” seemed to suggest otherwise. 


The Original Rule: Who Was Previously Covered? Under the previous NYC debt collection regulations, a “debt collector” was defined as any person or organization primarily engaged in collecting debts owed to a third party. This rule aligned with the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which also exempts original creditors from its definition of “debt collector.” The NYC rule required third-party debt collectors to adhere to strict guidelines for consumer communication, dispute resolution, and transparency, including: Providing specific disclosures to consumers at the outset of the collection process. Restricting the times and frequency of debt collection calls. Prohibiting false representations or deceptive practices. However, creditors collecting their own debts were not subject to these requirements, as they were not classified as “debt collectors” under the NYC regulation. This exemption meant that companies could directly pursue debt collection without the added obligations placed on third-party collectors. 


What’s Changed in the Amended Rule? The recent amendments broaden the definition of “debt collector” to include creditors collecting their own debts, even though the language of the statute still defines a “debt collector” as any person or entity engaged in collecting debts “owed or due to another person.” Many creditors initially assumed the amended rule would maintain the original scope by excluding them from compliance requirements. However, NYC DCWP clarified during the November 7 Q&A that the intent of the amended rule is to include all creditors collecting on their own behalf. To address the confusion, NYC DCWP has proposed an additional amendment that will explicitly state that creditors collecting their own debts are considered “debt collectors” under NYC regulations. This amendment is expected to be finalized by November 12, 2024. 


What Does This Mean for Creditors and Debt Collectors? The expanded definition means that creditors collecting their own debts will now be subject to the same compliance standards as third-party collectors. This includes requirements for: Disclosures at the beginning of the collection process, including the amount owed and contact details. Restrictions on call frequency and time, designed to protect consumers from excessive communication. Prohibitions on misleading representations and practices that might pressure consumers unfairly.


 Key Takeaways for Affected Businesses The NYC DCWP’s amendments represent a shift toward more stringent regulation across all debt collection practices in the city. Creditors and debt collectors alike should prepare for the April 1, 2025, enforcement date by updating compliance practices to meet the revised standards. NYC DCWP’s clarification underscores its commitment to consumer protection by ensuring consistency in debt collection practices, regardless of whether the collector is a third party or an original creditor. 


If you have questions about these changes or need assistance navigating compliance under the amended rules, please reach out to our team for tailored guidance. 

 

纽约市消费者与劳动者保护部(NYC DCWP)近期宣布,将修订后的债务催收条例的执行日期从2024年12月1日推迟至2025年4月1日。

此次延迟是对行业关注以及ACA International, Inc.和Independent Recovery Resources, Inc.发起的法律挑战的回应,同时也将条例的生效日期与新的执行时间表对齐。然而,最新修订标志着纽约市债务催收规则范围的重大转变,扩大了监管义务,将包括自行催收债务的债权人纳入监管范围。为了澄清这些变化,NYC DCWP于11月7日举行了一场问答会,会上确认尽管“债务催收人”的更新定义似乎表明另有解释,修订后的规则确实适用于债权人。

原始规则:此前的适用范围根据此前的纽约市债务催收条例,“债务催收人”被定义为主要从事为第三方收债的任何个人或组织。该规则与联邦《公平债务催收实践法案》(FDCPA)一致,该法案也将原始债权人排除在“债务催收人”定义之外。纽约市规则要求第三方债务催收人遵守严格的消费者沟通、争议解决及透明度指引,包括:在催收过程开始时向消费者提供特定披露。限制债务催收电话的时间和频率。禁止虚假陈述或欺骗性行为。然而,自行催收债务的债权人并不受上述要求的约束,因为他们未被归类为条例下的“债务催收人”。这一豁免意味着公司可以直接追讨债务,而无需履行第三方催收人需要遵守的附加义务。修订规则的变化最新修订扩大了“债务催收人”的定义,将自行催收债务的债权人也包括在内,尽管法规语言仍将“债务催收人”定义为从事收取“其他人所欠债务”的任何个人或实体。许多债权人最初认为修订后的规则将维持原来的范围,不要求他们遵守合规义务。

然而,NYC DCWP在11月7日的问答会上明确表示,修订规则的目的是将自行催收的所有债权人纳入监管范围。为了解决这一困惑,NYC DCWP已提议进一步修订,明确表示自行催收债务的债权人根据纽约市法规也被视为“债务催收人”。这一修订预计将于2024年11月12日最终确定。

这对债权人和债务催收人意味着什么?扩大后的定义意味着自行催收债务的债权人现在需要遵守与第三方催收人相同的合规标准,包括:在催收过程开始时进行披露,包括欠款金额及联系方式。对电话频率及时间的限制,旨在保护消费者免受过度沟通的困扰。禁止误导性陈述及不公平地向消费者施压的行为。受影响企业的关键要点NYC DCWP的修订代表了对纽约市所有债务催收实践更严格的监管转变。债权人和债务催收人都应在2025年4月1日执行日期前更新合规实践,以符合修订后的标准。NYC DCWP的澄清强调了其通过确保债务催收实践的一致性来保护消费者的承诺,无论催收人是第三方还是原始债权人。

如果您对这些变化有疑问,或需要帮助以在修订后的规则下进行合规,请随时联系团队获取量身定制的指导。

This postponement, made in response to industry concerns and a legal challenge from ACA International, Inc. and Independent Recovery Resources, Inc., also aligns the effective date with the new enforcement timeline. The recent amendments, however, mark a significant shift in the scope of NYC’s debt collection rules, expanding regulatory obligations to include creditors collecting their own debts. To clarify these changes, NYC DCWP held a Q&A session on November 7, where it was confirmed that the amended rules would indeed apply to creditors—even though the updated definition of “debt collector” seemed to suggest otherwise. 


The Original Rule: Who Was Previously Covered? Under the previous NYC debt collection regulations, a “debt collector” was defined as any person or organization primarily engaged in collecting debts owed to a third party. This rule aligned with the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which also exempts original creditors from its definition of “debt collector.” The NYC rule required third-party debt collectors to adhere to strict guidelines for consumer communication, dispute resolution, and transparency, including: Providing specific disclosures to consumers at the outset of the collection process. Restricting the times and frequency of debt collection calls. Prohibiting false representations or deceptive practices. However, creditors collecting their own debts were not subject to these requirements, as they were not classified as “debt collectors” under the NYC regulation. This exemption meant that companies could directly pursue debt collection without the added obligations placed on third-party collectors. 


What’s Changed in the Amended Rule? The recent amendments broaden the definition of “debt collector” to include creditors collecting their own debts, even though the language of the statute still defines a “debt collector” as any person or entity engaged in collecting debts “owed or due to another person.” Many creditors initially assumed the amended rule would maintain the original scope by excluding them from compliance requirements. However, NYC DCWP clarified during the November 7 Q&A that the intent of the amended rule is to include all creditors collecting on their own behalf. To address the confusion, NYC DCWP has proposed an additional amendment that will explicitly state that creditors collecting their own debts are considered “debt collectors” under NYC regulations. This amendment is expected to be finalized by November 12, 2024. 


What Does This Mean for Creditors and Debt Collectors? The expanded definition means that creditors collecting their own debts will now be subject to the same compliance standards as third-party collectors. This includes requirements for: Disclosures at the beginning of the collection process, including the amount owed and contact details. Restrictions on call frequency and time, designed to protect consumers from excessive communication. Prohibitions on misleading representations and practices that might pressure consumers unfairly.


 Key Takeaways for Affected Businesses The NYC DCWP’s amendments represent a shift toward more stringent regulation across all debt collection practices in the city. Creditors and debt collectors alike should prepare for the April 1, 2025, enforcement date by updating compliance practices to meet the revised standards. NYC DCWP’s clarification underscores its commitment to consumer protection by ensuring consistency in debt collection practices, regardless of whether the collector is a third party or an original creditor. 


If you have questions about these changes or need assistance navigating compliance under the amended rules, please reach out to our team for tailored guidance. 

 

纽约市消费者与劳动者保护部(NYC DCWP)近期宣布,将修订后的债务催收条例的执行日期从2024年12月1日推迟至2025年4月1日。

此次延迟是对行业关注以及ACA International, Inc.和Independent Recovery Resources, Inc.发起的法律挑战的回应,同时也将条例的生效日期与新的执行时间表对齐。然而,最新修订标志着纽约市债务催收规则范围的重大转变,扩大了监管义务,将包括自行催收债务的债权人纳入监管范围。为了澄清这些变化,NYC DCWP于11月7日举行了一场问答会,会上确认尽管“债务催收人”的更新定义似乎表明另有解释,修订后的规则确实适用于债权人。

原始规则:此前的适用范围根据此前的纽约市债务催收条例,“债务催收人”被定义为主要从事为第三方收债的任何个人或组织。该规则与联邦《公平债务催收实践法案》(FDCPA)一致,该法案也将原始债权人排除在“债务催收人”定义之外。纽约市规则要求第三方债务催收人遵守严格的消费者沟通、争议解决及透明度指引,包括:在催收过程开始时向消费者提供特定披露。限制债务催收电话的时间和频率。禁止虚假陈述或欺骗性行为。然而,自行催收债务的债权人并不受上述要求的约束,因为他们未被归类为条例下的“债务催收人”。这一豁免意味着公司可以直接追讨债务,而无需履行第三方催收人需要遵守的附加义务。修订规则的变化最新修订扩大了“债务催收人”的定义,将自行催收债务的债权人也包括在内,尽管法规语言仍将“债务催收人”定义为从事收取“其他人所欠债务”的任何个人或实体。许多债权人最初认为修订后的规则将维持原来的范围,不要求他们遵守合规义务。

然而,NYC DCWP在11月7日的问答会上明确表示,修订规则的目的是将自行催收的所有债权人纳入监管范围。为了解决这一困惑,NYC DCWP已提议进一步修订,明确表示自行催收债务的债权人根据纽约市法规也被视为“债务催收人”。这一修订预计将于2024年11月12日最终确定。

这对债权人和债务催收人意味着什么?扩大后的定义意味着自行催收债务的债权人现在需要遵守与第三方催收人相同的合规标准,包括:在催收过程开始时进行披露,包括欠款金额及联系方式。对电话频率及时间的限制,旨在保护消费者免受过度沟通的困扰。禁止误导性陈述及不公平地向消费者施压的行为。受影响企业的关键要点NYC DCWP的修订代表了对纽约市所有债务催收实践更严格的监管转变。债权人和债务催收人都应在2025年4月1日执行日期前更新合规实践,以符合修订后的标准。NYC DCWP的澄清强调了其通过确保债务催收实践的一致性来保护消费者的承诺,无论催收人是第三方还是原始债权人。

如果您对这些变化有疑问,或需要帮助以在修订后的规则下进行合规,请随时联系团队获取量身定制的指导。

This postponement, made in response to industry concerns and a legal challenge from ACA International, Inc. and Independent Recovery Resources, Inc., also aligns the effective date with the new enforcement timeline. The recent amendments, however, mark a significant shift in the scope of NYC’s debt collection rules, expanding regulatory obligations to include creditors collecting their own debts. To clarify these changes, NYC DCWP held a Q&A session on November 7, where it was confirmed that the amended rules would indeed apply to creditors—even though the updated definition of “debt collector” seemed to suggest otherwise. 


The Original Rule: Who Was Previously Covered? Under the previous NYC debt collection regulations, a “debt collector” was defined as any person or organization primarily engaged in collecting debts owed to a third party. This rule aligned with the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which also exempts original creditors from its definition of “debt collector.” The NYC rule required third-party debt collectors to adhere to strict guidelines for consumer communication, dispute resolution, and transparency, including: Providing specific disclosures to consumers at the outset of the collection process. Restricting the times and frequency of debt collection calls. Prohibiting false representations or deceptive practices. However, creditors collecting their own debts were not subject to these requirements, as they were not classified as “debt collectors” under the NYC regulation. This exemption meant that companies could directly pursue debt collection without the added obligations placed on third-party collectors. 


What’s Changed in the Amended Rule? The recent amendments broaden the definition of “debt collector” to include creditors collecting their own debts, even though the language of the statute still defines a “debt collector” as any person or entity engaged in collecting debts “owed or due to another person.” Many creditors initially assumed the amended rule would maintain the original scope by excluding them from compliance requirements. However, NYC DCWP clarified during the November 7 Q&A that the intent of the amended rule is to include all creditors collecting on their own behalf. To address the confusion, NYC DCWP has proposed an additional amendment that will explicitly state that creditors collecting their own debts are considered “debt collectors” under NYC regulations. This amendment is expected to be finalized by November 12, 2024. 


What Does This Mean for Creditors and Debt Collectors? The expanded definition means that creditors collecting their own debts will now be subject to the same compliance standards as third-party collectors. This includes requirements for: Disclosures at the beginning of the collection process, including the amount owed and contact details. Restrictions on call frequency and time, designed to protect consumers from excessive communication. Prohibitions on misleading representations and practices that might pressure consumers unfairly.


 Key Takeaways for Affected Businesses The NYC DCWP’s amendments represent a shift toward more stringent regulation across all debt collection practices in the city. Creditors and debt collectors alike should prepare for the April 1, 2025, enforcement date by updating compliance practices to meet the revised standards. NYC DCWP’s clarification underscores its commitment to consumer protection by ensuring consistency in debt collection practices, regardless of whether the collector is a third party or an original creditor. 


If you have questions about these changes or need assistance navigating compliance under the amended rules, please reach out to our team for tailored guidance. 

 

纽约市消费者与劳动者保护部(NYC DCWP)近期宣布,将修订后的债务催收条例的执行日期从2024年12月1日推迟至2025年4月1日。

此次延迟是对行业关注以及ACA International, Inc.和Independent Recovery Resources, Inc.发起的法律挑战的回应,同时也将条例的生效日期与新的执行时间表对齐。然而,最新修订标志着纽约市债务催收规则范围的重大转变,扩大了监管义务,将包括自行催收债务的债权人纳入监管范围。为了澄清这些变化,NYC DCWP于11月7日举行了一场问答会,会上确认尽管“债务催收人”的更新定义似乎表明另有解释,修订后的规则确实适用于债权人。

原始规则:此前的适用范围根据此前的纽约市债务催收条例,“债务催收人”被定义为主要从事为第三方收债的任何个人或组织。该规则与联邦《公平债务催收实践法案》(FDCPA)一致,该法案也将原始债权人排除在“债务催收人”定义之外。纽约市规则要求第三方债务催收人遵守严格的消费者沟通、争议解决及透明度指引,包括:在催收过程开始时向消费者提供特定披露。限制债务催收电话的时间和频率。禁止虚假陈述或欺骗性行为。然而,自行催收债务的债权人并不受上述要求的约束,因为他们未被归类为条例下的“债务催收人”。这一豁免意味着公司可以直接追讨债务,而无需履行第三方催收人需要遵守的附加义务。修订规则的变化最新修订扩大了“债务催收人”的定义,将自行催收债务的债权人也包括在内,尽管法规语言仍将“债务催收人”定义为从事收取“其他人所欠债务”的任何个人或实体。许多债权人最初认为修订后的规则将维持原来的范围,不要求他们遵守合规义务。

然而,NYC DCWP在11月7日的问答会上明确表示,修订规则的目的是将自行催收的所有债权人纳入监管范围。为了解决这一困惑,NYC DCWP已提议进一步修订,明确表示自行催收债务的债权人根据纽约市法规也被视为“债务催收人”。这一修订预计将于2024年11月12日最终确定。

这对债权人和债务催收人意味着什么?扩大后的定义意味着自行催收债务的债权人现在需要遵守与第三方催收人相同的合规标准,包括:在催收过程开始时进行披露,包括欠款金额及联系方式。对电话频率及时间的限制,旨在保护消费者免受过度沟通的困扰。禁止误导性陈述及不公平地向消费者施压的行为。受影响企业的关键要点NYC DCWP的修订代表了对纽约市所有债务催收实践更严格的监管转变。债权人和债务催收人都应在2025年4月1日执行日期前更新合规实践,以符合修订后的标准。NYC DCWP的澄清强调了其通过确保债务催收实践的一致性来保护消费者的承诺,无论催收人是第三方还是原始债权人。

如果您对这些变化有疑问,或需要帮助以在修订后的规则下进行合规,请随时联系团队获取量身定制的指导。

Get In Touch

All information displayed on this website is informational and shall not be deemed as legal advice.  If you are currently dealing with a legal situation, you are invited to contact us through email or by phone. Until an attorney-client relationship has been established, we urge that you avoid sharing any confidential information.

In Affiliation with Beijing DeHeng Law Offices

©2024 by DeHeng Chen LLC.

Get In Touch

All information displayed on this website is informational and shall not be deemed as legal advice.  If you are currently dealing with a legal situation, you are invited to contact us through email or by phone. Until an attorney-client relationship has been established, we urge that you avoid sharing any confidential information.

In Affiliation with Beijing DeHeng Law Offices

©2024 by DeHeng Chen LLC.

Get In Touch

All information displayed on this website is informational and shall not be deemed as legal advice.  If you are currently dealing with a legal situation, you are invited to contact us through email or by phone. Until an attorney-client relationship has been established, we urge that you avoid sharing any confidential information.

In Affiliation with Beijing DeHeng Law Offices

©2024 by DeHeng Chen LLC.